MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318753234 · doi:10.4000/babel.14814

Inchieste in cerca d’autori

2023· article· it· W4318753234 on OpenAlexaff
Lise Bossi

Bibliographic record

VenueBabel · 2023
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsAssociation for Canadian and Québec Literatures
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Al di là delle classificazioni generiche apparenti, il fattore strutturante comune all’insieme dell’opera di Sciascia è, secondo noi, quello del meccanismo dell’inchiesta.Sia esso mutuato dalla forma letterariamente “impura” del giallo i cui codici generici e simbolici sono usati à contre-emploi dallo scrittore, o da quella, di matrice manzoniana, della ricerca filologico-storica su documenti d’archivio, oppure da quella borgesiana del cruciverba letterario, tale meccanismo è quello della ricerca della Verità che, sola, può permettere di ripristinare la Giustizia con l’aiuto degli strumenti della Ragione allo scopo di elaborare una contro-narrazione di fronte alla manomissione da parte del Potere – politico, religioso, mediatico – delle Grandi Narrazioni che strutturavano la storia e la cultura classica.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.354
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBabelSame topicEducational and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207