An intelligent vision recognition method based on deep learning for pointer meters
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Nowadays, pointer instruments remain the main state monitoring devices in the power industry, because they have strong mechanical stability to resist electromagnetic interferences compared with digital instruments. Although the object detection algorithms based on deep learning have widely been used in the field of instrument detection, the meter recognition process still relies on threshold segmentation to recognize object points and on Hough transform to extract the meter pointer. An intelligent vision recognition method based on YOLOv5 and U 2 -Net network (YLU 2 -Net) is proposed to improve the accuracy and efficiency of meter recognition in a complex environment. Firstly, the pointer meter is located in the instrument images by using the YOLOv5 network as a region of interest (RoI). Then, the instrument RoI is processed by means of perspective transformation and image resizing. Thirdly, an improved U 2 -Net image segmentation method with the deep separable convolution and the focal loss function is devised to distinguish the pointers and scales from the background in the instrument RoI. Further, a dimension reduction reading method with the polar coordinate transformation is developed to calculate the meter reading accurately and efficiently. Finally, the ablation experiment is conducted to test the performance of each algorithm module in our method, and the competition experiment is completed to compare our method with other state-of-the-art ones. The experimental results verify the accuracy and efficiency of the YLU 2 -Net recognition method proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it