MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318763323 · doi:10.1088/1361-6501/acb80b

An intelligent vision recognition method based on deep learning for pointer meters

2023· article· en· W4318763323 on OpenAlexaff
Leisheng Chen, Xing Wu, Chao Sun, Ting Zou, Kai Meng, Peihuang Lou

Bibliographic record

VenueMeasurement Science and Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Object Detection Techniques
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionHough transformSegmentationAutomatic meter readingRegion of interestImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Nowadays, pointer instruments remain the main state monitoring devices in the power industry, because they have strong mechanical stability to resist electromagnetic interferences compared with digital instruments. Although the object detection algorithms based on deep learning have widely been used in the field of instrument detection, the meter recognition process still relies on threshold segmentation to recognize object points and on Hough transform to extract the meter pointer. An intelligent vision recognition method based on YOLOv5 and U2-Net network (YLU2-Net) is proposed to improve the accuracy and efficiency of meter recognition in a complex environment. Firstly, the pointer meter is located in the instrument images by using the YOLOv5 network as a region of interest (RoI). Then, the instrument RoI is processed by means of perspective transformation and image resizing. Thirdly, an improved U2-Net image segmentation method with the deep separable convolution and the focal loss function is devised to distinguish the pointers and scales from the background in the instrument RoI. Further, a dimension reduction reading method with the polar coordinate transformation is developed to calculate the meter reading accurately and efficiently. Finally, the ablation experiment is conducted to test the performance of each algorithm module in our method, and the competition experiment is completed to compare our method with other state-of-the-art ones. The experimental results verify the accuracy and efficiency of the YLU2-Net recognition method proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMeasurement Science and TechnologySame topicImage and Object Detection TechniquesFrench-language works237,207