MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4318764335 · doi:10.5194/tc-2022-218-ac1

Reply on RC1

2023· peer-review· en· W4318764335 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
James Anheuser

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea iceArcticArctic ice packAdvectionOcean gyreClimatologySnowGeologySea ice thicknessAtmospheric sciencesEnvironmental scienceOceanographyPhysicsGeomorphologyThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Thermodynamic and dynamic sea ice thickness processes are affected by differing mechanisms in a changing climate. Independent observational datasets of each are essential for model validation and accurate projections of future sea ice conditions. Here we present the first long-term, sub-seasonal temporal resolution, basin-wide and Eulerian climatology of dynamically and thermodynamically driven sea ice thickness effects across the Arctic. Basin-wide estimates of thermodynamic growth rate are determined by coupling passive microwave retrieved snow–ice interface temperatures to a simple sea ice thermodynamic model, total growth is calculated from weekly Alfred Wegener Institute (AWI) CS2SMOS sea ice thickness spanning fall 2010 through spring 2021, and the dynamics component is calculated as their difference. The dynamic effects are further separated into advection and deformation effects using a sea ice motion dataset. Thermodynamic growth varies from less than 0.04 m wk-1 in the central Arctic to greater than 0.08 m wk-1 in the seasonal ice zones. High positive dynamic effects of greater than 0.04 m wk-1, as high as twice that of thermodynamic growth, are found north of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago where the Transpolar Drift and Beaufort Gyre deposit ice. Strong negative dynamic effects of greater than 0.08 m wk-1 are found where the Transpolar Drift originates, nearly equal to thermodynamic effects in these regions. Yearly results from the winter of 2019–2020 compare well with a recent study of the dynamic and thermodynamic effects on sea ice thickness along the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) drift track during the winter of 2019–2020. Couplets of deformation and advection effects with opposite sign are common across the Arctic, with positive advection effects and negative deformation effects found in the Beaufort Sea and negative advection effects and positive deformation effects found in most other regions. The seasonal cycle shows deformation effect and overall dynamic effects increasing as the winter season progresses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score0.586

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0230.021
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1750.145

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→