TME: Tree-guided Multi-task Embedding Learning towards Semantic Venue Annotation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The prevalence of location-based services has generated a deluge of check-ins, enabling the task of human mobility understanding. Among the various types of information associated with the check-in venues, categories (e.g., Bar and Museum ) are vital to the task, as they often serve as excellent semantic characterization of the venues. Despite its significance and importance, a large portion of venues in the check-in services do not have even a single category label, such as up to 30% of venues in the Foursquare system lacking category labels. We, therefore, address the problem of semantic venue annotation, i.e., labeling the venue with a semantic category. Existing methods either fail to fully exploit the contextual information in the check-in sequences, or do not consider the semantic correlations across related categories. As such, we devise a Tree-guided Multi-task Embedding model (TME for short) to learn effective representations of venues and categories for the semantic annotation. TME jointly learns a common feature space by modeling multi-contexts of check-ins and utilizes the predefined category hierarchy to regularize the relatedness among categories. We evaluate TME over the task of semantic venue annotation on two check-in datasets. Experimental results show the superiority of TME over several state-of-the-art baselines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it