MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Exploring Groundwater Responses to the 2021 Drought and Atmospheric River Events across British Columbia, Canada

2023· preprint· en· W4318776950 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alexandre H. Nott, D. M. Allen, W. Jesse Hahm

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsPacific Institute for Climate SolutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroundwaterHydrometeorologyHydrology (agriculture)Climate changeEnvironmental scienceHydrographGeographyPhysical geographyGeologyPrecipitationOceanographyFlood mythMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most studies on the impacts of extreme hydrometeorological events on hydrological processes have focused primarily on surface water systems rather than groundwater systems. This study explores and seeks to untangle the complex nature of groundwater dynamics and resilience across British Columbia (BC) in response to the 2021 heatwave-intensified drought and atmospheric rivers (ARs). Historically, there have been many episodic drought events along with substantially wet periods. However, 2021 marked an unprecedented year for the immediate co-occurrence of intense and extreme drought and deluge. This weather whiplash resulted in the lowest and highest groundwater levels on record for many wells across BC. The record meteorological drought, intensified by a 13-day heatwave in late June, affected the entire province and lasted for over 50 days in the south coast region. This was followed in November by the most intense ARs to make landfall on record in southwestern BC. Groundwater hydrograph anomalies for 2021 were computed relative to their short-term historical mean for 194 provincial observation wells across the province. The 2021 anomalies showed a limited but distinct range of responses to both the drought and ARs, and cluster into three response groups, largely associated with their respective hydroclimatic regime. Many coastal wells showed a strong response to drought; however, nearly all wells in the southern interior responded substantially, with groundwater levels significantly below their historical range by late summer. Presently, groundwater levels seem to have recovered across the province, especially on the coast. This resiliency is attributed in part to the ARs that made landfall since last year along with a particularly wet, La Niña winter. The majority of coastal wells showed a much stronger signal to the ARs compared to the interior or eastern BC wells, likely due to the more rapid and intense rainfall experienced in southwestern BC. Groundwater systems across BC were variably impacted by these hydrometeorological extremes, showcasing the need for focused and area-specific approaches to water allocation decisions in assuring sustainable withdrawal practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.150

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies→French-language works237,207→