MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318811571 · doi:10.17161/ygas.v36i.19088

The Great War, Literary Tastes, and Political Correctness: The Strange Case of Charles Pollen Adams, German Dialect Poet

2001· article· en· W4318811571 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Geoffrey Orth

Bibliographic record

VenueYearbook of German-American Studies · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Linguistics and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of OxfordYork UniversityYale University
KeywordsGermanPoliticsPolitical correctnessLiteraturePollenHistoryArtPhilosophyLinguisticsPolitical scienceLawBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Charles Pollen Adams was a strange candidate to be America's most {xjpular and widely-read German dialect poet at the turn of the twentieth century.'To begin with, he was not of German but of Yankee, that is.New England ancestry, and, as far as is known, was not at all proficient in German, neither standard nor dialect, and had never studied the language formally.Other New Englanders, including his distant relative John Quincy Adams, had exhibited an affinity for German language, literature, and culture which dated back to the earliest days of colonization.But while Adams was named for the German patriot and scholar Charles Pollen, his initial contact with German dialect, according to numerous biographical sources, came not from scholarly circles but from listening as a youth to his family s washerwoman and from conversing with Pennsylvania German soldiers in the Army o f the Potomac during his rather lengthy convalescence from wounds sustained in the batde of Gettysburg.Adams never claimed to be a professional writer, and saw his poetry largely as an avocation.In his own words, "I am, and always have been in the business world and my writing has been my diversion and not my occupation.^ Yet while he had committed him self early on to a career in business-primarily as a dry goods merchant-his poetr>-made him well known in the literary' world, not escaping the attention of such luminaries as Oliver Wendell Holmes, Twain, Whittier, James Whitcomb Riley, and Longfellow.He claimed, in a lecture given at the Emerson College o f Oratory in 1900, to have been inspired in his literary use of German dialect by Charles Godfrey Leland , an American who had studied at Heidelberg and Munich and had popularized the genre through his "Hans Breitmann ballads.Leland s collection showed his familiarity with high German culture, such as his parody of the opening lines of the Nibelungenlied.The ballads, beginning with "Hans Breitmann s Barty (1856), were widely circulated in mid-nineteenth-century America and depicted, in a "peculiar jumble of English and German," what Adams called the coarse type of German-rollicking, beer drinking and sometimes profane.* Breitmann was emblematic for the German immigrants who arrived in the U.S. after the abortive

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0170.024
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYearbook of German-American StudiesSame topicHistorical Linguistics and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207