MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318821623 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2023.3241355

RIS-Assisted Energy- and Spectrum-Efficient Symbiotic Transmission in NOMA Systems

2023· article· en· W4318821623 on OpenAlexaff
Mingjiang Wu, Xianfu Lei, Xiangyun Zhou, Xiaohu Tang, Octavia A. Dobre

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of China
KeywordsNomaComputer scienceTelecommunications linkOptimization problemConvex optimizationResource allocationEfficient energy useQuality of serviceTransmission (telecommunications)Spectral efficiencyDistributed computingComputer networkMathematical optimizationChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsAlgorithmEngineeringRegular polygonMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) is able to create favorable reflecting channels for different users and piggyback additional data in the reflected signals. The former brings benefits to non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA), while the latter enables a mechanism of symbiotic radio (SR). Inspired by these unique advantages, we consider a general SR-NOMA system model where an RIS is deployed to assist both the NOMA in an uplink multi-channel system and the Internet-of-Things (IoT) data transmission. This general model also allows for different performance objectives from the NOMA users. In particular, the users can be either energy-efficiency oriented or spectrum-efficiency oriented. To strike the performance trade-off between these two types of users, a performance metric called resource efficiency (RE) is leveraged to formulate the optimization problem. We jointly design the time-frequency resource allocation, multi-user power control and RIS phase shifts to maximize the weighted sum-RE of the system, subject to the quality-of-service constraints of the SR-NOMA system. An efficient alternating optimization framework with a series of algorithms, including matching theory, fractional programming method, and inner majorization-minimization method, is developed to solve this highly complex and non-convex problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207