Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study elucidated the origin of the alligator gar ( Atractosteus spatula ) by investigating the traces of the alligator gars in various waters in different provinces and cities of China. Alligator gars originally entered China through ornamental fish trade (illegal smuggling). They are abandoned by people probably because it is difficult to raise them, or released by people out of “goodwill”. Therefore, the invasion sites of alligator gars are mainly concentrated in the waters of the residential districts and the lakes of the parks. The invasion of alligator gars has brought potential threats to the aquatic ecosystem in China. Through reading the literature and regulations, this study found that alligator gars are not included in the list of alien invasive species at present. However, according to the overwintering ability and damage degree of alligator gars, some experts have suggested that it should be included in the list of alien invasive species. This study also put forward its own views on the proper treatment of the alien species alligator gars.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".