Absorption and Scattering of UV and Visible Light Through Simulated Martian Regoliths and Rock Samples
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ultraviolet shielding materials are potential ecological niches for biosignatures. Finding such materials on Mars would narrow the search for potentially habitable regions. A mini-goniometer was built to collect transmission spectra as a function of scattering angle for Mars analog regoliths (JSC Mars-1, basalt, cheto bentonite, and kieserite) and crystalline rock samples from the Haughton impact structure on Devon Island, Nunavut, in the Canadian High Arctic Archipelago. The transmission through the materials was assessed at ultraviolet and visible wavelengths and at different scattering angles. From the results, it is possible to classify the samples into UV transmitters and UV quenchers. UV transmitters are materials that favor transmittance of UV wavelengths compared to photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), while the UV quenchers are materials that effectively block UV radiation from propagating into the subsurface. Additionally, samples that are effective UV quenchers tend to have more isotropic scattering profiles, whereas UV transmitters tend to favor forward scattering profiles. Samples with greater porosity had greater overall transmission. The depths at which radioresistant microorganisms can exist on present-day Mars are estimated by modeling the transmission for regoliths and crystalline rocks under martian insolation. The depth at which LD 90 occurs is found to range down to 0.3 mm, while still allowing up to 1000 kJ/m 2 of PAR at those depths. Due to the exceptionally protective nature of JSC Mars-1, intimate mixtures of organisms and regolith will result in some organisms experiencing orders of magnitude less UV flux than others, even when protected by only a single grain of simulant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".