The features of vegetative and emotional disorders at chronization of duodenal ulcer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traditionally, duodenal ulcer is referred to the psychosomatic disorders. Not by accident, in the classic investigations of the founder of the stress theory, Canadian scientist R. Selye, acute gastric ulcer serves as a model of somatic expression of stress, and the followers of the ideas of neurism I. P. Pavlov, physiologists K. M. Bykov and I. T. Kurcin used peptic ulcer also as an illustration of the role of cortico-visceral relationships in the genesis of somatic diseases. A big number of papers have been published over the past decade, devoted to the role of psycho-emotional and vegetative disorders in the development of peptic ulcer. The investigation involved 62 patients (23 women and 39 men) with duodenal ulcer, aged from 18 to 42 years. The state of vegetative nervous systems was investigated by common scheme with analysis of initial vegetative tonus. Besides, the presence and degree of the syndrome of vegetative dystonia was analyzed with the use of unified questionnaires and schemes. The obtained data showed that one of the mechanisms of the duodenal ulcer chronization is the formation of dissociation between vegetative and emotional disorders, in which the increased anxiety is combined with vegetative parasympaticotonia and lack of vegetative activity support. From the practical standpoint, these data give the ground for the obligatory use in the peptic ulcer treatment schemes of tranquilizers and antidepressants, and in case of chronic course — of vegetotropic agents with tonic effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".