Навчання в дистанційному синхронному та асинхронному режимах в українських закладах вищої освіти з 2020 року дотепер
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<strong>1. Тези</strong> <strong>Цитуйте у Ванкувер стилі українською:</strong> [Шевченко ОС, Шевченко ВВ. Навчання в дистанційному синхронному та асинхронному режимах в українських закладах вищої освіти з 2020 року дотепер. Матеріали Міжнародної науково-практичної конференції «Цифрова трансформація та диджитал технології для сталого розвитку всіх галузeй сучасної освіти, науки і практики» (Міжнародний університет прикладних наук у Ломжі, Польща, 26.01.2023) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7598963]. <strong>Ключові слова:</strong> навчання під час війни, вища освіта, Україна. <strong>2. Сертифікати учасників конференції</strong> <strong>1. Abstract</strong> <strong>Cite in English in Vancouver style:</strong> [Shevchenko AS, Shevchenko VV. Learning in remote synchronous and asynchronous modes in Ukrainian higher education institutions from 2020 until now. International scientific and practical conference "Digital transformation and technologies for all areas sustainable development of modern education, science and practice" (International University of Applied Sciences in Lomza, Poland, 26 Jan 2023) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7598963 (in Ukrainian)]. <strong>Keywords:</strong> education during the war, higher education, Ukraine. <strong>2. Certificates of conference participants</strong>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.154 | 0.341 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".