Segmental Suture Gonioscopy-Assisted Transluminal Trabeculotomy: Comparison of Superior Versus Inferior Hemisphere Outcomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PRCIS: Analysis of efficacy, safety, and risk factors for failure of superior versus inferior 180-degree segmental gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculectomy showed no significant difference between approaches, with novel risk factors for failure identified. PURPOSE: Compare the efficacy, safety, and risk factors for failure of superior versus inferior 180-degree segmental suture gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT). DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective interventional cohort study of 297 eyes of 243 glaucomatous patients, which underwent superior or inferior 180-degree suture hemi-GATT surgery combined with phacoemulsification at one of 3 Canadian ophthalmological surgical centres in Calgary, Alberta or Toronto, Ontario. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the hazard ratio (HR) of failure for the "primary success" criteria. "Primary success" was defined as an intraocular pressure (IOP) <18 mm Hg and either 1) IOP reduced by ≥20% from baseline on the same number of IOP-lowering medications or 2) IOP ≤ baseline on fewer medications. Secondary outcome measures included HRs of failure for alternative criteria ("complete success", "qualified success" and "20% IOP reduction"), cross-sectional analysis, and Cox proportional hazard analysis for risk factors associated with increased failure for the complete cohort. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The crude and adjusted HR of failure for the "primary success" criteria for superior surgeries relative to inferior surgeries were 1.27 (95% CI = 0.86-1.88) and 1.50 (95% CI = 0.91-2.46), with no statistically significant difference between approaches. Of the secondary criteria, there was statistical significance in favor of inferior surgeries only for crude analysis of the "20% reduction" criteria (1.40/1.27 (95% CI = 1.01-1.92). Increased risk of failure by the "primary success" measure for either intervention was seen with primary open angle glaucoma, advanced disease, and age below 70 years. There were no significant differences in the frequency of postoperative complications between cohorts, which were present in 72 superior (44.4%) and 67 inferior (49.6%; P value = 0.41) eyes; mostly early postoperative hyphema, iritis, and corneal edema. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study showed no difference in inferior versus superior 180 degrees of hemi-GATT/phacoemulsification cataract surgeries through the majority of analyses. Nonmodifiable factors including glaucoma type, advanced disease, and younger age were associated with a significantly higher risk of failure in this cohort. Further study is warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".