MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318913857 · doi:10.1097/mph.0000000000002623

Successful Treatment of Patient With Ewing Sarcoma in the Setting of Inherited Cholestatic Liver Disease

2023· article· en· W4318913857 on OpenAlexaff
Jessica D. Daley, Katharine Halligan, Denise L. Howrie, Cláudia Salgado, Alexandra Superdock, Erika Friehling, Kelly M. Bailey

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsPediatric Oncology Group
FundersNational Institutes of HealthEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Cancer InstituteUniversity of Pittsburgh
KeywordsEtoposideMedicineSarcomaIfosfamideVincristineImmunosuppressionDoxorubicinEwing's sarcomaCyclophosphamideChemotherapyCholestasisInternal medicineOncologyGastroenterologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 1 (PFIC1) is an inherited, progressive cholestatic liver disease. Here, we present an approach to the treatment of Ewing sarcoma in a patient with PFIC1. The diagnosis of PFIC1 presents a unique challenge in the treatment of Ewing sarcoma, as the standard-of-care vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide/ifosfamide and etoposide chemotherapy backbone for Ewing sarcoma therapy treatment relies heavily on intact hepatic metabolism. In addition, we report prolonged lymphopenia and severe infectious complications in this patient, both of which may be attributed to more severe immunosuppression in setting of poor hepatic metabolism of chemotherapeutic agents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatric Hematology/OncologySame topicDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsFrench-language works237,207