MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318920300 · doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000004577

Vertebral Bone Quality Score as a Predictor of Pedicle Screw Loosening Following Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Disease

2023· article· en· W4318920300 on OpenAlex
Wenshuai Li, Houze Zhu, Zijian Hua, Dechao Miao, Feng Wang, Tong Tong, Linfeng Wang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
FundersHebei Medical University
KeywordsMedicineVisual analogue scaleMagnetic resonance imagingOdds ratioLumbarLumbar vertebraeOsteoporosisSurgeryHounsfield scaleFixation (population genetics)Receiver operating characteristicBone mineralRetrospective cohort studyLogistic regressionNuclear medicineRadiologyComputed tomographyInternal medicinePopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether magnetic resonance imaging-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score can predict pedicle screw loosening in patients who underwent pedicle screw fixation, and to compare, which measurement, the VBQ score or the Hounsfield unit (HU) value, is more predictive of pedicle screw loosening. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In clinical work, we found that patients with screw loosening had higher VBQ scores. In addition, some studies have found a correlation between VBQ scores and osteoporosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who were treated with lumbar pedicle screw fixation were reviewed. The VBQ score was measured using magnetic resonance imaging scans. The HU value for L1 to L4 lumbar bone mineral density was measured with computed tomography scans. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with pedicle screw loosening. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate the value of VBQ scores in predicting pedicle screw loosening. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were included in the final analysis. The pedicle screw loosening rate was 35% (55 of 156 patients). The postoperative low-back pain visual analog scale score was higher in the loosening group (3.0 ± 2.0 vs . 2.4 ± 1.8; P < 0.05). The VBQ score was higher in the loosening group than in the nonloosening group (3.28 ± 0.58 vs . 2.82 ± 0.50; P < 0.01). In multivariable analysis, nonsingle segment fixation [odds ratio (OR): 3.992; 95% CI: 1.643-9.701; P = 0.002], lowest instrumented vertebrae at S1 (OR: 3.378; 95% CI: 1.387-8.226; P = 0.007), HU value (OR: 0.988; 95% CI: 0.976-1.000; P = 0.047), and VBQ score (OR: 3.908; 95% CI: 1.624-9.405; P = 0.002) were factors associated with screw loosening. The areas under the curve for using the VBQ score and HU value to predict pedicle screw loosening were 0.720 and 0.702, respectively. The optimal VBQ score threshold was 3.05 for predicting pedicle screw loosening (sensitivity: 0.655; specificity: 0.713). CONCLUSIONS: The VBQ score was an influential factor associated with lumbar pedicle screw loosening, and a higher VBQ score was significantly correlated with a higher risk of screw loosening. The VBQ score was a better predictor of pedicle screw loosening than the HU value in patients who underwent pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.370
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it