Characterizing the Effect of Amylase Inhibitors on Maltodextrin Metabolism by Gut Bacteria Using Fluorescent Glycan Labeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diet-derived polysaccharides are an important carbon source for gut bacteria and shape the human gut microbiome. Acarbose, a compound used clinically to treat type 2 diabetes, is known to inhibit the growth of some bacteria on starches based on its activity as an inhibitor of α-glucosidases and α-amylases. In contrast to acarbose, montbretin A, a new drug candidate for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, has been reported to be more specific for the inhibition of α-amylase, notably human pancreatic α-amylase. However, the effects of both molecules on glycan metabolism across a larger diversity of human gut bacteria remain to be characterized. Here, we used ex vivo metabolic labeling of a human microbiota sample with fluorescent maltodextrin to identify gut bacteria affected by amylase inhibitors. Metabolic labeling was performed in the presence and absence of amylase inhibitors, and the fluorescently labeled bacteria were identified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting coupled with 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing. We validated the labeling results in cultured isolates and identified four gut bacteria species whose metabolism of maltodextrin is inhibited by acarbose. In contrast, montbretin A slowed the growth of only one species, supporting the fact that it is more selective. Metabolic labeling is a valuable tool to characterize glycan metabolism in microbiota samples and could help understand the untargeted impact of drugs on the human gut microbiota.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".