MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Excogitation of Stacked Strategy for Coronary Artery Disease Diagnosis

2022· article· en· W4318969257 on OpenAlexaff
Chokiyan Karthikeyini, Suresh Subramanian, Rm Bommi, Balaraman Sundarambal, V. Jacintha

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCADComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceBoosting (machine learning)Classifier (UML)Machine learningCoronary artery diseaseSupport vector machineFeature extractionExtreme learning machineStatistical classificationStackingPattern recognition (psychology)MedicineCardiologyEngineeringArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) is a dangerous deadly customary disease that prevents the follow of blood to the heart and influenced by several variable risk factors. Recently, machine learning (ML) algorithms assist clinicians for appropriate prediction of CAD by constructing predictive models that may reduce mortality. In this proposed method, UCI data repository and machine learning classifiers are used for prediction. The data available in the UCI repository is preprocessed and updated after feature extraction and validations. Then the processed data is applied to various machine learning classifiers such as eXtreme Gradinet Boosting, Support Vector machine, KNN classifier and stacking algorithm. The stacking algorithm surpassed the results of individual classifier with classification accuracy of 91.8%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.404
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.319
GPT teacher head0.512
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207