The risk premium in times of financial crisis: an assessment from ICAPM on the MENA region
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of our research is to study the impact of financial crisis on Risk premium evolution for a set of emerging countries of MENA (Middle East and North Africa), giving special attention to the appreciation of the local risk premium in addition to the currency risk premium through the study of the dynamics of the financial integration under two assumptions: perfect integration and partial segmentation. At the methodological level, we test a conditional version of the international model of the financial assets ICAPM of De initially proposed by Adler and Dumas 1983 [Adler, M., & Dumas, B. (1983). International portfolio choice and corporation finance: A synthesis. The Journal of Finance, 38(3), 925-984.]. Our analysis is based on the conditional model of regime change of Bekaert and Harvey (1995) [Bekaert, G., & Harvey, C. R. (1995). Time‐varying world market integration. The Journal of Finance, 50(2), 403-444.], we follow the econometric modeling using the Kalman filter and the Markov regime-switching model with variable transition probabilities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".