MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4318999354 · doi:10.1016/j.cont.2023.100576

Do differences in abdominal movement patterns during coughing and forced expiration affect cranioventral bladder neck displacement in healthy nulliparous subjects?

2023· article· en· W4318999354 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueContinence · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPelvic floor disorders treatments
Canadian institutionsInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineExpirationDisplacement (psychology)Neck of urinary bladderAbdomenUrologyUrinary bladderSurgeryAnatomyRespiratory systemPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abdominal movement patterns during coughing and forced expiration (FE) fall into two categories: abdominal inward movement (AIM) and abdominal outward movement (AOM). These abdominal movement patterns are thought to affect cranioventral (CV) bladder neck displacement differently. However, many studies have described an absent or altered PFM response during coughing, assuming PFM dysfunction, without considering the impact of abdominal movement pattern differences. The aim of this study was to observe abdominal movement patterns during coughing and FE and compare the associated (CV) bladder neck displacement patterns. Participants performed three maximal expulsive coughs, followed by three FEs, during which the respiratory inductive plethysmography (RIP) method was used to identify abdominal movement patterns. Concurrently, perineal 2D ultrasound was applied to assess CV bladder neck displacement. All measurements were done in the standing and crook lying position. Descriptive statistics were computed for abdominal movement patterns and bladder neck displacement. Chi-squared tests were used to compare abdominal movement patterns and CV bladder neck displacement. One hundred and forty-nine healthy nulliparous women without PFM dysfunction participated in the study. During both coughing and FE in the standing position, women who displayed an AIM pattern had a significantly higher occurrence of CV bladder neck displacement compared to those presenting AOM. In the crook lying position, there was a significantly higher occurrence of bladder neck displacement during coughing in subjects showing AIM compared to those with AOM. Significant differences were found in abdominal movement patterns during coughing and FE in healthy nulliparous subjects in standing and crook lying positions. Most of the subjects showed AOM during coughing or FE in both standing and lying positions. This is contrary to the existing literature and needs further investigation. Abdominal movement patterns impacted CV bladder neck displacement during coughing and FE while standing and during coughing in the crook lying position. Clinicians should be aware of different abdominal movement patterns, which should be considered for diagnosis and treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.733

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it