MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE SOCIAL MEDIA PERFORMANCES OF TELEVISION DRAMAS TELEVİZYON DRAMALARININ SOSYAL MEDYA PERFORMANSLARINA YÖNELİK KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR ANALİZ

2017· article· tr· W4319003107 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Journal of New Media · 2017
Typearticle
Languagetr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia Discourse and Social Analysis
Canadian institutionsCégep de Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial mediaSociologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gnmzde televizyon dramalarnn sosyal medya platformlarnda popler olmas ve izleyicilerin etkileim kurmas nemli bir alma alan olarak karmza kmaktadr.En ok izlenen televizyon program trlerinden biri olan televizyon dramalar adna yapmclar, ynetmenler veya kanallar tarafndan sosyal medya platformlarnda hesaplar alarak paylamlar yaplmaktadr

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.528
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it