MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4319006496 · doi:10.1161/str.54.suppl_1.wmp52

Abstract WMP52: Markers Of Endothelial Glycocalyx Damage In Patients Withvascular Cognitive Impairment Associated With Cerebral Small Vessel Disease

2023· article· en· W4319006496 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rui Martins, Guilherme Riccioppo Rodrigues, Maria Clara Zanon Zotin, Millene Rodrigues Camilo, Thiago Oscar Goulart, Júlio César Nather Júnior, Frederico Fernandes Aléssio-Alves, Francisco Antunes Dias, Octávio Marques Pontes‐Neto

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeurovascular bundleGlycocalyxMontreal Cognitive AssessmentDiseaseInternal medicineLogistic regressionHyperintensityCognitive impairmentStroke (engine)PathologyCardiologyMagnetic resonance imagingRadiologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD) involves a myriad of pathogenic mechanisms affecting small vessels of the brain, leading to a significant impact on motor and cognitive functions, and it is the main cause of Vascular cognitive impairment (VCI). The endothelial glycocalyx (EG), the layer lining the vascular endothelium, has a pivotal player in maintaining the proper function of neurovascular unit, and its degradation may be involved in VCI due to cSVD. Objectives: to investigate the relationship between markers of EG damage and VCI related to cSVD. Methods: Cross-sectional study based on clinical data and serum samples for the quantification of EG damage markers (syndecan-1, hyaluran) of VCI related to cSVD patients and of a control group derived from a dataset of healthy workers from the same institution. We used an automatic logarithm for segmentation and volumetric evaluation of white matter lesions on brain MRI of the patients. Logistic regression models and c-statistics were used to identify the independent variables related to VCI and investigate the accuracy of syndecan-1 to detect VCI. We studied the association of thebiomarkers and MoCA scores, index of independence in activities of daily living and whitematter lesion burden respectively. Results: Between July 2019 and March 2020, we studied 22 patients with VCI associated with cSVD and compared them with a dataset of 22 healthy workers from the same institution. Patients with VCI were older, had a higher prevalence of diabetesmellitus and hypertension, had a worse index of independence for daily activities, and higherlevels of syndecan-1 (78,4 vs 24; p < 0,01). There was no difference in hyaluran levels between both groups. In multivariate analysis, only age (OR 1,35;CI 1,04 - 1,76; p = 0,02) and syndecan-1 levels (OR 1,08;CI 1,01 - 1,15;p = 0,01) related to VCI. The ROC curve ofsyndecan-1 levels to predict VCI had a area under de curve of 0,78 (CI 0,64 - 0,92) and there was a correlation between syndecan-1 levels and MoCA scores (rho = - 0,34;p = 0,02). There were no correlations between syndecan-1 and hyaluran levels and index of independence and white matter lesion burden respectively. Conclusions: Syndecan-1, but not hyaluran, is a potential biomarker for VCI associated with cSVD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→