MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319011305 · doi:10.1161/str.54.suppl_1.wp177

Abstract WP177: Effects Of The Oral Factor XIa Inhibitor Asundexian On Intracranial Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Non-Cardioembolic Ischemic Stroke: PACIFIC-Stroke Randomized Trial

2023· article· en· W4319011305 on OpenAlexaff
Pooja Khatri, Ashkan Shoamanesh, Hardi Mundl, Eric E. Smith, Feryal Saad, Lizhen Xu, Laura Heenan, Pablo Colorado, Bodo Kirsch, Christoph Neumann, Stuart J. Connolly, Robert G. Hart

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and genetic disorders
Canadian institutionsHamilton General HospitalUniversity of CalgaryMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)ThrombolysisPlaceboRandomizationRandomized controlled trialFibrinolytic agentAntithromboticClinical trialPost-hoc analysisInternal medicineSurgeryMyocardial infarctionPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The phase 2 PACIFIC-Stroke trial of patients with acute non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke assessed asundexian, the oral small molecule Factor XIa inhibitor, versus placebo administered within 48h of ischemic stroke to prevent recurrent stroke. This trial uniquely included moderate and severe strokes, which were excluded from other early timeframe, secondary prevention trials of escalated antithrombotic therapy. The primary results suggest a reduction in recurrent ischemic stroke and TIA when added to antiplatelet therapy without an overall increase in intracranial hemorrhage (ICH)(in press at the Lancet ). In this post-hoc analysis, we will further characterize the observed ICH. Methods: PACIFIC-Stroke (NCT04304508) was an international, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 randomized trial enrolling 1808 participants and comparing three dosages (10mg, 20mg, or 50mg daily) of asundexian with placebo. Participants were randomized within 48h of the qualifying ischemic stroke, and all received background antiplatelet therapy chosen by the local investigator. Eligibility for Part A was limited to patients with NIHSS </=7 who did not receive thrombolysis or endovascular thrombectomy, and Part B allowed an NIHSS up to 15 and treatment with reperfusion therapy (if >24 hours prior to randomization). Participants underwent MRIs within 72 hours of randomization and after 6 months. Results: In this presentation, we will further characterize the ICHs observed in the 1808 participants (1334 asundexian, 452 placebo) of the PACIFIC-Stroke trial. Further characterization will include timing, baseline stroke severity, post-thrombolysis/endovascular therapy status, asundexian dosing, and associated symptoms and radiological subtypes will be presented. Conclusions: Early anticoagulation of ischemic stroke patients with asundexian added to antiplatelet therapy was not associated with an increase in ICH compared to placebo, supporting the premise that inhibition of Factor XIa may prevent thrombosis without increasing bleeding. Further characterization of the observed ICHs associated with this novel drug compared to placebo will be presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicCerebrovascular and genetic disordersFrench-language works237,207