"Der Linie folgend, schrieb entzückt ich: Blau”: Tradition and Modernism in the Poetry of Walter Bauer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
If statistics are to be trusted, blue is by far the most popular color both with (German) men and women.'This is not surprising: we live on the "Blue Planet," we are surrounded by the blue sky, the blue seas, by blue mountains and blue distances.Germans speak of "blau machen" and "ins Blaue fahren," they often "reden das Blaue vom Himmcl herunter" and "erleben ihr blaues Wunder."The .special significance of the color blue reaches back to the known origins of mankind.Since times immemorial, blue has been the color of the gods.Marduk, the highest god of the old Babylonians, the Persian god Mithras, the Egyptian goddess Isis, the Germanic god Wotan -all were clad in a blue robe.Hinduism imagines the beginning of the world as a blue light, and an elephant painted blue serves as a symbol of divine inspiration.Similarly, in ancient Egypt, a blue hippopotamus was considered to po.ssess the power of bestowing life.Tibetan Buddhism sees blue streaming forth from the heart of the god Vairocana and forming the highest spiritual essence, the primal form of all consciousnes,s.In Christian religious painting, "Himmel-Blau" (blue as the color of both "sky" and "heaven") symbolized the wisdom and power of the divine creation emanating and descending from above.As the color of both Christ s and Mary s mantle, blue .served to symbolize the revelation of the divine presence on earth.In Renaissance landscape painting with its newly introduced perspective, the symbolic function of the color blue became an expressive one: it now served to depict distance and openne.ss of the natural setting.This effect was de.scribcd more preci.selyby Goethe in the sixth "Abteilung" of his "Farbenlehre," completed in 1807: Diese Farbe macht fur das Auge eine sonderbare und fast unaus.sprechlicheWirkung.Sie ist als Farbe eine
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".