Magmatic degassing controlled the metal budget of the Axi epithermal gold deposit, China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract From integrated textural and compositional studies of auriferous and barren pyrite/marcasite in the epithermal Axi gold deposit, China, we have identified a relationship between multiple gold mineralizing events, mafic magma recharge, and fluid-rock reactions. Three generations of pyrite (Py1–3) and four generations of marcasite (Mar1–4) record episodic gold mineralizing events, followed by silver-copper-lead-zinc-cadmium enrichment. The gold mineralizing events are recorded by high concentrations of subnanometer-sized gold in Py1, Py3, and Mar3 (max. = 147, 129, and 34 ppm, med. = 39, 34, and 12 ppm). Based on previous Re-Os age determinations of pyrite and U-Pb zircon ages of the andesitic wallrock, these gold events slightly postdate pulsed mafic magma recharge and represent the incursion of Au-As-S-rich magmatic volatiles into circulating meteoric water. Silver-Cu-Pb-Zn-Cd enrichment in Py2, Mar2, and Mar4 are consistent with quiescent degassing and gradual Ag-Cu-Pb-Zn-Cd enrichment in an evolved felsic magma. Barren Mar1 records the dominance of meteoric water and a limited magmatic fluid contribution. High-Co-Ni-V-Cr-Ti contents in porous cores of Py1 and Mar2 are attributed to wall rock alteration and dissolution-reprecipitation. The results provide convincing evidence that the metal budget (especially for Au, Ag, Cu, Pb, Zn, Sb) of the hydrothermal fluids and sulfides in epithermal systems are controlled by the influx of magmatic fluids and associated magma, whereas the enrichment of certain fluid-immobile elements, such as Co, Ni, V, Cr, and Ti, is caused in part by fluid-rock interaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".