HULL-LESS BARLEY: THE STATE OF STUDY AND PROSPECTS OF USE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main places of growing of hull-less barley varieties are considered to be the South-East Asia, mountainous Central and West China with its lowlands. These are the places where there is a great variety of hull-less barley. The data received with a radio isotope method show that hull-less barley dates back to 7900 years B.C. Thus, hull-less barley appeared significantly later than chaffy barley, which grew in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic (9700-9300 years B.C.). Barley grain is used for making different groats. Barley groats is grain with removed hulls, processed according to a kind of groats. The volume of groats depends on a structure of starch and amount of hulls. The grain of hull-less barley is free from the hulls and mostly glassy, so the volume of groats received from hull-less barley is much more than from chaffy barley. Barley and pearl barley are made from barley grain. Besides hull-less barley is used as a valuable fodder, especially for monogastric animals. Nowadays the breeding of hull-less barley varieties is being carried out in Canada, Japan, US and Sweden. Comparing chemical structure of hull-less and chaffy barley, we must note that hull-less barley prevails the other one, except in a content of cellulose. In the foreign scientific works the prior tasks for study are the problems of domestication of hull-less barley, its varieties, tolerance and resistance to pests and diseases. Native literature is devoted to the problems of practical breeding, study of green mass and grain of hull-less barley.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".