MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319067806 · doi:10.13033/ijahp.v14i3.1068

2022 MCDM Junior Researcher Best Paper Award

2023· article· en· W4319067806 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Birsen Karpak

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDigital Transformation in Industry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiple-criteria decision analysisJurySection (typography)Library scienceManagementOperations researchPolitical scienceEngineeringComputer scienceLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There were five finalists for the 2022 MCDM Junior Researcher Best Paper Award of the MCDM section of INFORMS. Finalists were Sune Lauth Gadegaard, Aarhus University, Denmark; Eleftherios Siskos, Paul Scherrer Institut Switzerland; Merve Bodur, University of Toronto, Canada; and Mohammad Ghaderi, Pompeu Fabra University, Spain (the winner). Jiapeng Liu, Xi’an Jiaotong University, China could not attend the meeting. Roman Słowiński was the 2022 Jury Chair, Poznań University of Technology All 5 finalists received a diploma at the business meeting of the MCDM Section of INFORMS on October 16, 2022. The winner selected by the Jury was Mohammad Ghaderi. This was a great success for the MCDM/A community to receive ten nominations and to have five finalists for this award!

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.474
Threshold uncertainty score0.432

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy ProcessSame topicDigital Transformation in IndustryFrench-language works237,207