MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319069152 · doi:10.1109/tim.2023.3241977

Frequency Estimation Enhancement for Industrial Free Induction Decay Signals Under Low SNR via Hankelization and Modified Covariance

2023· article· en· W4319069152 on OpenAlexaff
Huan Liu, Zehua Wang, Tao Meng, Haobin Dong, Zheng Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBasic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCovarianceFree induction decaySIGNAL (programming language)Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Noise (video)MathematicsTensor (intrinsic definition)AlgorithmCovariance matrixTime–frequency analysisSingular value decompositionControl theory (sociology)StatisticsComputer scienceTelecommunicationsSpin echoArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The frequency of a free induction decay (FID) signal from an industrial proton precession magnetometer (PPM) is proportional to the magnetic field strength. To achieve high-precision frequency estimation for an FID signal with a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), a long estimation period is always required, which limits the application scenarios of the PPMs, such as aeromagnetic detection. To break through the contradiction between frequency estimation precision and time, this article proposes an enhanced frequency estimation method via Hankelization and modified covariance, dubbed EFE-HMC. First, the collected 1-D FID signal is constructed as a third-order tensor through Hankelization, and then the noise tensors are removed by multilinear singular value decomposition (MLSVD) to improve the SNR; second, the preprocessed third-order tensor is inverted into a 1-D signal, and the modified covariance is employed to estimate the corresponding signal frequency; and third, an experimental test platform is constructed to compare the proposed EFE-HMC with three state-of-the-art methods including carry chain, equal precision, and Dn-ResUnet. The results demonstrate that when the SNR is lower than −10 dB and the estimation time varies from 50 to 200 ms, the frequency estimation precision is improved by 60% on average. Moreover, the frequency estimation time is reduced by about 150 ms when the frequency estimation precision is better than 0.03 Hz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.859
Threshold uncertainty score0.706

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementSame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207