MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

HUXIN: In-Memory Crossbar Core for Integration of Biologically Inspired Stochastic Neuron Models

2023· preprint· en· W4319078323 on OpenAlexaff
Louis Primeau, Xuening Dong, Amirali Amirsoleimani, Roman Genov

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMemristorSolverCrossbar switchQuantization (signal processing)Nonlinear systemComputer scienceComputationDynamical systems theoryStability (learning theory)MathematicsAlgorithmElectronic engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we solve nonlinear systems of ordinary differential equations coupled to noisy forcing, commonly used for models of neurons such as the Hodgkin-Huxley equation, over a memristor crossbar based computing system. We demonstrate stability and faithfulness of the distributions even under the effects of nonidealities of the memristors and the system itself. We investigate the properties of the dynamical systems under quantization faithfulness, varying the level of precision of the fixed point integer representation and concluding that 24 bits is enough for solution of the Hodgkin-Huxley equations, demonstrating that our solver can operate with both high precision and achieve speedups with low precision approximate computation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.511
Threshold uncertainty score0.945

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.149
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207