MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319078498 · doi:10.7759/cureus.34595

Outcome of Intra-articular Injection of Total Stromal Cells and Platelet-Rich Plasma in Primary Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2023· article· en· W4319078498 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Moshiur R Khasru, Md Abu Bakar Siddiq, Talukder AGM Zakaria N Jubery, Tangila Marzen, Ashraful Hoque, AKM Zahir Ahmed, Masuda Begum, Fazle Rabbi Chowdhury, Abul Khair M Salek, Md. Moniruzzaman Khan

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeriodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineWOMACOsteoarthritisPlatelet-rich plasmaPhysical therapyKnee painVisual analogue scaleRheumatologyRandomized controlled trialRehabilitationMann–Whitney U testInternal medicineSurgeryPlateletPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy appeared promising in knee osteoarthritis (OA). We examined if a single intra-articular (IA) autologous total stromal cells (TSC) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection improved knee pain, physical function, and articular cartilage thickness in knee OA. METHODS: The study was performed in the physical medicine and rehabilitation department of Bangabandhu Shaikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Knee OA was diagnosed according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria and randomly assigned to treatment (received TSC and PRP) and control groups. Kallgreen-Lawrance (KL) scoring system was used to grade primary knee OA. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0-10 cm) for pain, WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) for physical function, and medial femoral condylar cartilage (MFC) thickness (millimeters) under ultrasonogram (US) were documented and compared between groups before and after treatment. Statistical Package analyzed data for Social Scientists (SPSS 22.0; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) was used for data analysis. Pre- and post-intervention outcomes were measured using the Wilcoxon-sign test, whereas Mann-Whitney U-test calculated the difference between groups; a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Result: In the treatment group, 15 received IA-TSC and PRP preparation, and in the control group, 15 patients received no injection, but quadricep muscle-strengthening exercise. There was no significant difference between groups regarding VAS for pain, WOMAC physical function, and cartilage thickness before starting the treatment and two weeks after intervention. VAS for pain and WOMAC physical function scores improved profoundly in the treatment group after 12 and 24 weeks of intervention; the pain and physical function scores difference between groups was also significant. However, significant mean femoral cartilage thickness was not changed until the end of 24 weeks (U=175.00, p=0.009 two-tailed and U= 130.00, p=0.016 two-tailed, respectively, for right and left knee). CONCLUSION: Single TSC and PRP injection reduces knee pain and improves physical function and cartilage thickness in knee OA. While pain and physical function improvement happen earlier, cartilage thickness change takes more time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicPeriodontal Regeneration and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207