Le thème du dragon chez les enfants au regard des structures anthropologiques de l’imaginaire chez Gilbert Durand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article entend montrer l’actualité du thème du dragon chez les enfants au Québec, à partir d’une étude portant sur les productions culturelles (livres et films) qui leur sont destinées, mais aussi à partir d’une analyse de tests anthropologiques (AT.9) complétés par 194 enfants de six à douze ans entre 2009 et 2019. Cette analyse des AT.9, contextualisée par celle de la culture environnante des enfants, nous permet de conclure à une persistance du thème du dragon, à une pluralité des interprétations de cette figure et à la pertinence de la théorie des structures anthropologiques de l’imaginaire (G. Durand) pour notre époque, y compris auprès des enfants. De tout ceci émerge un constat : dès six ans, les enfants possèdent déjà les structures anthropologiques mais aussi certaines figures culturelles que l’on retrouve chez les adultes et dans les grandes cultures de l’humanité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".