MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319156825 · doi:10.14710/buloma.v12i1.47843

Keragaman Fitoplankton dan Potensi Harmfull Algal Blooms (HABs) di Perairan Sungai Musi Bagian Hilir Provinsi Sumatera Selatan

2022· article· id· W4319156825 on OpenAlexaff
Riris Aryawati, Melki Melki, Inda Azhara, Tengku Zia Ulqodry, Muhammad Hendri

Bibliographic record

VenueBULETIN OSEANOGRAFI MARINA · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and Coastal Ecosystems
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyNaviculaOscillatoriaBotanyAlgaeCyanobacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sungai Musi merupakan sungai terpanjang di Pulau Sumatera yang banyak dimanfaatkan masyarakat sebagai jalur transportasi dan berbagai aktivitas lainnya. Sungai Musi merupakan habitat fitoplankton yang dapat menjadi indikator kualitas perairan. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui kelimpahan, keragaman, keseragaman, dominansi, dan menganalisis potensi HABs fitoplankton di Perairan Sungai Musi bagian hilir. Hasil pengamatan pada 10 stasiun, ditemukan 6 genus fitoplankton dari kelas Bacillariophyceae (Bacillaria, Coscinodiscus, Ghemponema, Navicula, Skeletonema, Strepthotecha), 6 genus dari kelas Chlorophyceae (Chlorella, Hydrodiction, Micrasterias, Pediastrum, Platydorina, Spirogyra), 1 genus dari kelas Cyanophyceae (Oscillatoria). Hasil analisis diperoleh kelimpahan sebesar 10-483 sel/L, indeks keanekaragaman (H’) 0,89-1,57, indeks keseragaman (E) 0,75-0,99, dan indeks dominansi (C) 0,25-0,46 dengan genus fitoplankton di kelimpahan tertinggi Spirogyra dan terendah Bacillaria. Hasil pengamatan menunjukkan parameter fisika-kimia termasuk kategori baik untuk pertumbuhan fitoplankton dan ditemukan beberapa jenis fitoplankton yang berpotensi HABs (Coscinodiscus, Skeletonema, Oscillatoria). The Musi River, the longest river on the island of Sumatra, is widely used by the community as a transportation route and for various other activities. Therefore, the Musi River is a habitat for phytoplankton and can be a bioindicator of water quality. This study aims to determine the success of analysing the abundance, diversity, uniformity, dominance and potential of HABs phytoplankton downstream of the Musi River. Observations of 10 sampling stations found six genera from the class Bacillariophyceae (Bacillaria, Coscinodiscus, Ghemponema, Navicula, Skeletonema, Streptotheca), six genera from the class Chlorophyceae (Chlorella, Hydrodiction, Micrasterias, Pediastrum, Platydorina, Spirogyra), one genus class Cyanophyceae (Oscillatoria). The results of the analysis obtained an abundance of 18-483 cells/L, the diversity index (H') 0.89-1.57, uniformity index (E) 0.75-0.99, and dominance index (C) 0.25-0.46 with the phytoplankton genus in the highest abundance of Spirogyra and the lowest Bacillariophyceae. Furthermore, the results of the observations show that the physicochemical parameters are in a suitable category for phytoplankton growth and found several types of phytoplankton that have the potential for HABs (Coscinodiscus, Skeletonema, Oscillatoria).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBULETIN OSEANOGRAFI MARINASame topicMarine and Coastal EcosystemsFrench-language works237,207