MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319159008 · doi:10.3917/ela.208.0017

Intégrer les usages dans une ressource terminologique : quelques pistes méthodologiques

2023· article· fr· W4319159008 on OpenAlexaff
Valérie Delavigne

Bibliographic record

VenueÉla Études de linguistique appliquée · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
Topiclinguistics and terminology studies
Canadian institutionsGDG Environnement
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La socioterminologie se concentre sur l’étude des discours spécialisés et la circulation des termes. Elle fournit un cadre pour produire un dictionnaire autour des questions environnementales susceptible d’intégrer les usages terminologiques liés aux enjeux socio-politiques. Cet article se centre sur les aspects méthodologiques qui doivent permettre d’incorporer à la description ces enjeux, les conflits, les évolutions et les contradictions de ce champ tels que les termes et leur phraséologie les expriment en corpus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.038
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.038
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.010
Science and technology studies0.0030.009
Scholarly communication0.0130.017
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉla Études de linguistique appliquéeSame topiclinguistics and terminology studiesFrench-language works237,207