Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Public Management
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Entrepreneurship is defined as the generation of a “new or innovative idea”. Innovation is the energy that drives productivity. It is the purpose or reason for any adaptation, improvement or invention, and when successfully applied, is able to transform scarce resources into results. It is known that an entrepreneurial culture in public organizations raises the level of management. The objective of this article is to evaluate the current Brazilian scenario regarding studies that investigate whether entrepreneurship and innovation are capable of transforming the public sector. The methodology used included the search for articles on the Capes journal portal. The results demonstrated the importance of an entrepreneurial profile with the capacity to innovate, with more flexible and creative behavior. They show how leaders can create market opportunities and are able to perfect their actions. It finds that an entrepreneurial culture in public organizations raises the level of management. It was found that in the public sector, at all levels of policy and services there are different forms of innovation including, conceptual, systemic, political, administrative/organizational, in-service products and in service.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it