MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319240475 · doi:10.25144/14823

EVALUATION OF FLYOVER AURALIZATIONS OF TODAY'S AND FUTURE LONG-RANGE AIRCRAFT CONCEPTS

2023· preprint· fr· W4319240475 on OpenAlexaff
Beat Schäffer, Lothar Bertsch, Ingrid Le Griffon, Axel Heusser, Catherine Lavandier, Reto Pieren

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace and Aviation Technology
Canadian institutionsNeuroDevNet
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsRange (aeronautics)Computer scienceArchitectural engineeringEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyTransport engineeringGeographyEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The European research project ARTEM (Aircraft noise Reduction Technologies and related Environmental iMpact) develops innovative aircraft noise reduction technologies such as advanced engine fan acoustic lining, metamaterials and low-noise high-lift systems applied to a vehicle with enhanced capabilities for shielding of the engine noise, namely, a blended wing body.Using aircraft flyover auralization in laboratory listening experiments, such future technologies can be evaluated with respect to human sound perception.To assess the reliability of such perception-based 1 beat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.530
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAerospace and Aviation TechnologyFrench-language works237,207