MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319264761 · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.21976475.v1

Inversion-Free Sparse Bayesian Learning for Temporally Correlated Signal Recovery

2023· preprint· en· W4319264761 on OpenAlexaff
Yuhui Song

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInversion (geology)Bayesian inferenceComputer scienceAlgorithmSparse matrixCompressed sensingBayesian probabilityInferenceSignal recoveryMaximizationMathematical optimizationMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Compressed sensing recovers the sparse signal from far fewer samples than required by the well-known Nyquist--Shannon sampling theorem to speed up the measure- ment procedure. The sparse signal recovery performance can be significantly improved by exploiting the temporal correlation in the multiple measurement vector model within the framework of sparse Bayesian learning. However, it is inevitable to involve the matrix inversion for existing methods, making the application of these schemes to large datasets impractical. To overcome this bottleneck, in this letter, we propose an inversion-free sparse Bayesian learning algorithm for temporally correlated sparse signal recovery, which is free of any matrix inversion operation and only requires simple addition and multiplication operations. Specifically, utilizing a property for the convex quadratic func- tion, we obtain a lower bound for the likelihood distribution that enables the computationally efficient model inference based on the expectation-maximization algorithm. Simulation results show its superior performance over other state-of-the-art methods in terms of the recovery performance and the running time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207