MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319287613 · doi:10.1109/qcs56647.2022.00011

Rotation-inspired circuit cut optimization

2022· article· en· W4319287613 on OpenAlexaff
Gideon Uchehara, Tor M. Aamodt, Olivia Di Matteo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantum circuitOverhead (engineering)QubitQuantumQuantum computerComputer scienceUnitary stateAlgorithmElectronic circuitSet (abstract data type)Rotation (mathematics)Quantum stateTopology (electrical circuits)MathematicsQuantum networkArtificial intelligenceQuantum mechanicsPhysicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent works have demonstrated that large quantum circuits can be cut and decomposed into smaller clusters of quantum circuits with fewer qubits that can be executed independently on a small quantum computer. Classical post-processing then combines the results from each cluster to reconstruct the output of the original quantum circuit. However, the runtime for such hybrid quantum-classical algorithms is exponential in the number of cuts on a circuit. We propose Rotation-Inspired Circuit Cut Optimization (RICCO), an alternative method which reduces the post-processing overhead of circuit cutting, at the cost of having to solve an optimization problem. RICCO introduces unitary rotations at cut locations to rotate the quantum state such that expectation values with respect to one set of observables are maximized and others are set to zero. We demonstrate practical application of RICCO to VQE by classically simulating a small instance of VQE and comparing it to one of the existing circuitcutting methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.756
Threshold uncertainty score0.332

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207