MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319301630 · doi:10.1088/2053-1591/acb98f

Influence of incommensurate structure on the elastic constants of crystalline Bi<sub>2</sub>Sr<sub>2</sub>CaCu<sub>2</sub>O<sub>8+δ </sub> by Brillouin light scattering spectroscopy

2023· article· en· W4319301630 on OpenAlexaff
B. D. E. McNiven, J. P. F. LeBlanc, G. Todd Andrews

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Research Express · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrillouin SpectroscopyBrillouin scatteringBrillouin zoneSpectroscopyCondensed matter physicsElasticity (physics)ScatteringPhononCrystal (programming language)Single crystalLight scatteringWork (physics)Materials scienceChemistryCrystallographyOpticsPhysicsThermodynamicsQuantum mechanicsLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Brillouin light scattering spectroscopy was used to probe the room-temperature elasticity of crystalline high-T c superconductor Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ . A complete set of best-estimate elastic constants was obtained using established relationships between acoustic phonon velocities and elastic constants along with a simple expression relating crystal elastic constant C 22 to the corresponding constants of the constituent incommensurate sublattices. This latter relationship, which was derived and validated in the present work, has important implications for those studying incommensurate systems as it appears that it may be applied in its general form to any composite incommensurate crystal. The results obtained in this work are also consistent with sublattice assignments of Bi2Sr2O4 and CaCu2O4 reported in a previous Brillouin scattering study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials Research ExpressSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207