Hybrid Knowledge and Data Driven Synthesis of Runtime Monitors for Cyber-Physical Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent advances in sensing and computing technology have led to the proliferation of Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) in safety-critical domains. However, the increasing device complexity, shrinking technology sizes, and shorter time to market have resulted in significant challenges in ensuring the reliability, safety, and security of CPS. This article presents a hybrid knowledge and data-driven approach for designing run-time context-aware safety monitors that can detect early signs of hazards and mitigate them in CPS. We propose a framework for formal specification of unsafe system context using Signal Temporal Logic (STL) combined with two optimization approaches for scenario-specific refinement and integration of STL specifications using data collected from closed-loop CPS simulations. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in simulation using an autonomous driving system (ADS) and two closed-loop artificial pancreas systems (APS) as well as a publicly-available clinical trial dataset. The results show that a safety monitor developed with the proposed approaches demonstrates up to 4.7 times increase in average prediction accuracy (F1 score) over several well-designed baseline monitors while reducing both false-positive and false-negative rates in most scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it