MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319307267 · doi:10.12927/hcpol.2013.23589

Linguistic Minorities in Canada and Health

2013· article· fr· W4319307267 on OpenAlex
Louise Bouchard, Martin Desmeules

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare policy · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinguisticsLinguistic diversityPolitical scienceHistoryGeographySociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

anglais aient un statut d' galit juridique selon la Constitution canadienne, il y a lieu de s'interroger sur leur galit dans le domaine de la sant : les communauts francophones et anglophones du Canada, selon leur statut de minorit ou de majorit, prsentent-elles le mme profil sant ? Ont-elles accs aux mmes services de sant et dans les mmes conditions ? L' objectif de cet article cet article est de rendre compte des enjeux de sant relis au fait d' appartenir une minorit linguistique. Nos recherches permettent de mettre en vidence des disparits sociales et de sant qui peuvent tre attribues au fait minoritaire. Dans le contexte canadien des deux langues officielles, une politique de sant quitable devra dornavant prendre en considration la situation linguistique minoritaire comme dterminant de la sant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it