Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tento ÄlĂĄnek se zamÄĹuje na analĂ˝zu britsko-kanadskĂ˝ch vztahĹŻ v dobÄ ChanackĂŠ krize, kterĂĄ vypukla na podzim roku 1922, kdyĹž hrozilo vypuknutĂ ozbrojenĂŠho stĹetu mezi britskĂ˝mi jednotkami a silami tureckĂ˝ch nacionalistĹŻ, usilujĂcĂch o novĂŠ ĂşzemnĂ uspoĹĂĄdĂĄnĂ Turecka. BritskĂĄ vlĂĄda vedenĂĄ premiĂŠrem Davidem Lloydem Georgem doufala, Ĺže dominia vÄetnÄ Kanady vyslyťà Şådost VelkĂŠ BritĂĄnie k vojenskĂŠ ĂşÄasti, kterĂĄ by tureckĂ˝m nacionalistĹŻm demonstrovala sĂlu BritskĂŠho impĂŠria, ale tehdejĹĄĂ kanadskĂ˝ premiĂŠr William Lyon Mackenzie King nechtÄl bÄhem krize podĹĂdit zĂĄjmy svĂŠ zemÄ tÄm britskĂ˝m. ZatĂmco jeho pĹedchĹŻdci spoleÄnou politiku v rĂĄmci BritskĂŠho impĂŠria podporovali, Mackenzie King usiloval o vÄtĹĄĂ mĂru kanadskĂŠ nezĂĄvislosti na SpojenĂŠm krĂĄlovstvĂ v zahraniÄnÄpolitickĂ˝ch zĂĄleĹžitostech. Jeho zdrĹžovacĂ taktika s jasnou odpovÄdĂ BritĹŻm ohlednÄ vyslĂĄnĂ vojenskĂŠho kontingentu se mu nakonec vyplatila, jelikoĹž se krize urovnala mĂrovou cestou. Vzhledem k dalĹĄĂmu vĂ˝voji britsko-kanadskĂ˝ch vztahĹŻ lze vnĂmat Chanackou krizi nejen jako dĹŻsledek problĂŠmĹŻ na BlĂzkĂŠm vĂ˝chodÄ po skonÄenĂ prvnĂ svÄtovĂŠ vĂĄlky, ale takĂŠ jako dĹŻleĹžitĂ˝ meznĂk v cestÄ za kanadskou zahraniÄnĂ politikou, nezĂĄvislou na mateĹskĂŠ zemi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".