Crystal structure of a polyglycine hydrolase determined using a <i>RoseTTAFold</i> model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polyglycine hydrolases (PGHs) are secreted fungal proteases that cleave the polyglycine linker of Zea mays ChitA, a defensive chitinase, thus overcoming one mechanism of plant resistance to infection. Despite their importance in agriculture, there has been no previous structural characterization of this family of proteases. The objective of this research was to investigate the proteolytic mechanism and other characteristics by structural and biochemical means. Here, the first atomic structure of a polyglycine hydrolase was identified. It was solved by X-ray crystallography using a RoseTTAFold model, taking advantage of recent technical advances in structure prediction. PGHs are composed of two domains: the N- and C-domains. The N-domain is a novel tertiary fold with an as-yet unknown function that is found across all kingdoms of life. The C-domain shares structural similarities with class C β-lactamases, including a common catalytic nucleophilic serine. In addition to insights into the PGH family and its relationship to β-lactamases, the results demonstrate the power of complementing experimental structure determination with new computational techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".