MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319312359 · doi:10.4095/331387

Sixth Generation seismic hazard model of Canada: final input files used to generate the 2020 National Building Code of Canada seismic hazard values

2023· report· en· W4319312359 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michal Kolaj, S Halchuk, J Adams

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeismic hazardHazardDocumentationData fileCode (set theory)Hazard mapComputer scienceEngineeringDatabaseSeismologyGeologyProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The enclosed files provide OpenQuake compatible input files to reproduce the 6th Generation Seismic Hazard Model of Canada (CanadaSHM6) as used to produce the seismic hazard values for the 2020 edition of the National Building Code of Canada (NBCC 2020). Example hazard values at selected localities are included, in order for other users to verify that the model has been implemented as we intended. This report contains minimal technical information on CanadaSHM6; complete documentation will be released as a separate Open File. This report supersedes Open File 8630, and the values derived from the model and the online seismic hazard tool described herein supersede the trial values provided in Open File 8629.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.372
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismic Performance and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207