Calidad estética del paisaje y su implicancia en la intención de visita con fines de ecoturismo. El caso del parque nacional cerros de Amotape -Perú
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La investigación tuvo como objetivo determinar la implicancia de la valoración social de la calidad estética del paisaje en la intención de realizar ecoturismo en el Parque Nacional Cerros de Amotape (PNCA). Se aplicó un cuestionario de encuesta a una muestra de 383 ciudadanos peruanos residentes en áreas urbanas del departamento de Tumbes, en edad de trabajar y con nivel educativo superior alcanzado. Para evaluar la calidad visual del paisaje, se utilizó el método directo de subjetividad representativa (MDS) y se evaluó la intención de realizar ecoturismo en el PNCA mediante una escala Likert. Se utilizó estadística no paramétrica para evaluar la relación entre ambas variables. Los hallazgos de este estudio evidencian que existe una asociación positiva moderada entre calidad estética del paisaje y una actitud favorable hacia la práctica de actividades ecoturísticas en el PNCA, siendo el paisaje un elemento motivador de desplazamientos turísticos desde las zonas urbanas hacia entornos rurales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".