Processo criativo e linguagem visual do trabalho gráfico da Emilie Chamie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo visa analisar o processo criativo e a linguagem visual de alguns projetos de Emilie Chamie ao longo de sua trajetória profissional de quase 50 anos. Ela fez parte de uma geração de designers pioneiros que estudou no Instituto de Arte Contemporânea (IAC) do Museu de Arte de São Paulo (Masp). Sua formação nos anos 1950 e 1960 teve grande influência em seu trabalho. O artigo está organizado em quatro partes, sendo a primeira a introdução; a segunda descreve as fontes da pesquisa no acervo do Instituto de Estudos Brasileiros da Universidade de São Paulo (IEB-USP), as entrevistas realizadas e a revisão bibliográfica; a terceira parte apresenta a análise visual dos projetos ao longo dos anos; e termina com as considerações finais. Foi utilizada a metodologia de micro-história e história oral. Pretende-se trazer à tona a importância da produção de Emilie para a historiografia do design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".