MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319319038 · doi:10.3390/axioms12020162

On Modified Integral Inequalities for a Generalized Class of Convexity and Applications

2023· article· en· W4319319038 on OpenAlexaff
H. M. Srivastava, Muhammad Tariq, Pshtiwan Othman Mohammed, Hleil Alrweili, Eman Al-Sarairah, Manuel De la Sen

Bibliographic record

VenueAxioms · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Inequalities and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónEusko Jaurlaritza
KeywordsDifferentiable functionConvexityHadamard transformMathematicsInequalityClass (philosophy)Convex functionAlgebraic numberHermite polynomialsFrame (networking)Pure mathematicsRegular polygonAlgebra over a fieldApplied mathematicsComputer scienceMathematical analysisArtificial intelligenceGeometryTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we concentrate on and investigate the idea of a novel family of modified p-convex functions. We elaborate on some of this newly proposed idea’s attractive algebraic characteristics to support it. This is used to study some novel integral inequalities in the frame of the Hermite–Hadamard type. A unique equality is established for differentiable mappings. The Hermite–Hadamard inequality is extended and estimated in a number of new ways with the help of this equality to strengthen the findings. Finally, we investigate and explore some applications for some special functions. We think the approach examined in this work will further pique the interest of curious researchers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.185
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAxiomsSame topicMathematical Inequalities and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207