Delayed self-fertilization and chemical analysis of floral nectar of a perennial relative of the tomato and potato from Mexico
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We studied the floral reproductive biology and nectar chemistry of Jaltomata grandiflora (Solanaceae), an apparently rare perennial of Michoacán, Mexico. During day 1, flowers are pistillate (stigma receptive, anthers not yet presenting pollen); flowers close for the night. Early in the morning of day 2, the corolla re-opens, stamens elongate to five times their earlier length, and anthers dehisce; the dehisced anthers remain about 2 mm from the stigma for much of day 2. In the afternoon of day 2, the corolla again closes, the corolla–androecium abscises, and only then can pollen be seen on the stigma. Protogyny and herkogamy likely promote outcrossing during days 1 and 2, respectively. Autonomous self-pollination takes place at the end of the corolla's life and allows fruit and seed production in the absence of pollinators but results in fruits that are lighter and contain fewer seeds than fruits resulting from manual self-pollinations. Carbohydrates from floral nectar samples were separated and quantified using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled with corona charged aerosol detection. In nectar, mean sucrose concentration (0.482 mg/mg nectar), is about 10 and five times higher than glucose (0.043 mg/mg nectar) and fructose (0.095 mg/mg nectar) concentrations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".