MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4319340226 · doi:10.2196/preprints.45921

US-American professional IRONMAN® triathletes dominate participation but not performance in IRONMAN® races – an internet-based cross-sectional study using a machine learning approach (Preprint)

2023· preprint· en· W4319340226 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Beat Knechtle, Mabliny Thuany, David Valero, Elias Villiger, Pantelis Τ. Nikolaidis, Marília Santos Andrade, Ivan Čuk, Katja Weiss

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSports Performance and Training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemographyPsychologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND Since the first edition of IRONMAN® Hawaii in 1981, the number of races and finishers in the IRONMAN® format has increased considerably. Scientific literature has provided many insights into this specific sport discipline. However, we have no knowledge of where the fastest professional IRONMAN® triathletes originate and where the fastest IRONMAN® race courses take place. OBJECTIVE The aim of the present study was to investigate where in the world the fastest IRONMAN® race courses for professional IRONMAN® triathletes are. METHODS Data of all professional female and male IRONMAN® triathletes competing between 2002 and 2022 in all official IRONMAN® races were collected. A total of 6,954 finishers´ records (2,788 women and 4,166 men) from 68 different countries participating in 56 different event locations were considered. Data were analyzed using machine learning (ML) regression models. The models considered gender, country of origin, and event location as independent variables to predict the final race time. Five different algorithms (Random Forest Regressor, XG Boost Regressor, Ada Boost Regressor, Cat Boot Regressor, and Decision Tree Regressor) were examined. RESULTS The race site was the most important variable for the Random Forest Regressor model, while for the other four models, gender was the most important variable. A decision tree algorithm, trained with data from 2002 to 2022, showed that the fastest overall IRONMAN® race times of 08:38:48 h:min:s will be obtained in IRONMAN® Hawaii, IRONMAN® Florida, IRONMAN® Austria, IRONMAN® France, IRONMAN® Wisconsin, IRONMAN® Lanzarote or IRONMAN® Texas by male professional IRONMAN® triathletes originating from any other country than USA, Germany or Canada. Most of the professional IRONMAN® triathletes originated from the USA (1,786), followed by athletes from Germany (674) and Canada (427). Most athletes competed in IRONMAN® Hawaii (926), followed by IRONMAN® Florida (564) and IRONMAN® Austria (454). CONCLUSIONS The fastest IRONMAN® race courses for professional IRONMAN® triathletes are predominately located in the USA. Most of the professional IRONMAN® triathletes originated from the USA. The fastest IRONMAN® race times were achieved by male professional IRONMAN® triathletes originating from any other country than USA, Germany, or Canada. These insights are useful for athletes and coaches in planning their professional IRONMAN® career.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSports Performance and Training→French-language works237,207→