MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4319342119 · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2023.3243435

Look-Ahead VNF-FG Embedding Framework for Latency-Sensitive Network Services

2023· article· en· W4319342119 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsEricsson (Canada)Concordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScalabilityEmbeddingHeuristicsKey (lock)Distributed computingHeuristicLatency (audio)Artificial intelligenceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dynamic and zero-touch management is expected to be the key feature of next-generation 6G networks. Network Function Virtualization (NFV) is one of the key technologies for realizing such management through software-based networks. Despite great benefits offered by NFV, deploying network services (NSs) in NFV ecosystems remains a challenge, especially for latency-sensitive NSs, as they demand stringent latency requirements and fast service provisioning. Specifically, service graphs should be embedded into an infrastructure such that these requirements are satisfied while optimizing network operator’s objectives. To cope with the scalability of optimization-based approaches, heuristic methods are known as promising alternatives to find a satisfactory solution within an acceptable execution time. However, existing VNF embedding heuristics still suffer from the so-called causality issue, which may degrade the embedding solution quality. The causality issue means that embedding decisions cannot be optimally determined before all neighboring dependencies are known. To this end, we introduce our <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${h}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> -horizon sequential look-ahead greedy embedding framework, which provides efficient embedding and re-embedding strategies to alleviate the impact of the causality issue. The simulation results indicate that our proposed algorithm significantly improves embedding cost, compared to the existing heuristic algorithms while being much more scalable than an optimization-based approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.694
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it