MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Phytochemical Effects on FcepsilonRI and MrgprX2-mediated Activation of Human Mast Cells

2021· article· en· W4319434024 on OpenAlexaff
Marianna Kulka

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMast cells and histamine
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDegranulationMast cellImmunoglobulin EProinflammatory cytokineResveratrolReceptorPharmacologyInflammationChemistryBiologyCell biologyImmunologyBiochemistryAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Phytochemicals and herbal extracts are currently used in food supplements as a means of preventing and treating disease. Although phytochemicals have been studied for their potentially beneficial effects on coronary heart disease and their ability to prevent atherosclerosis, certain cancers and inflammatory disease, very little attention has been focused on the potential health benefits of phytochemicals in atopic disease. Mast cells synthesize and store several proinflammatory mediators and are centrally important in atopic diseases such as asthma. Our team has been characterizing the effect of several phytochemicals (flavonoids and polysaccharides) on mast cell activation and pro-inflammatory mediator production when mast cells were activated via the high affinity Fc epsilon receptor I (FceRI) or mas-related G protein coupled receptor, MrgprX2. We show that quercetin and resveratrol decrease mast cell degranulation of both bone marrow-derived mast cells and the human mast cell line (LAD2) by at least 50% (at 10 ug/mL) when the cells were activated via FceRI with IgE and antigen. However, these flavonoids had no effect on LAD2 cells activated via MrgprX2. Polysaccharides isolated from seaweed inhibited IgE/Ag and MrgprX2 activated degranulation of LAD2 cells (by 50%, p<0.01) with some polysaccharides specific to only MrgprX2 activation. These results suggest that mast cell activation can be differentially modulated by phytochemicals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicMast cells and histamineFrench-language works237,207