Comparison of Spatio-Temporal Variability of Daily Maximum Flows in Cold-Season (Winter and Spring) in Southern Quebec (Canada)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quebec has experienced a significant decrease in the amount of snow and an increase in temperature during the cold season. The objective of this study is to analyze the impacts of these climate changes on the spatio-temporal variability of the daily maximum flows generated by snowmelt in winter and spring using several statistical tests of correlation (spatial variability) and long-term trend (temporal variability). The study is based on the analysis of flows measured in 17 watersheds (1930–2019) grouped into three hydroclimatic regions. Regarding the spatial variability, the correlation analysis revealed that in winter, the flows are positively correlated with the agricultural area and the daily maximum winter temperature. In the spring, the flows are positively correlated with the drainage density and the snowfall but negatively correlated with the area of wetlands and the daily maximum spring temperature. As for temporal variability (long-term trend), the application of eight statistical tests revealed a generalized increase in flows in winter due to early snowmelt. In the spring, despite the decreased snow cover, no negative trend was observed due to the increase in the spring rainfall, which compensates for the decrease in the snowfall. This temporal evolution of flows in the spring does not correspond to the predictions of climate models. These predict a decrease in the magnitude of spring floods due to the decrease in the snowfall in southern Quebec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".