A novel method for measuring acute thermal tolerance in fish embryos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Aquatic ectotherms are particularly vulnerable to thermal stress, with certain life stages (embryos) predicted to be more sensitive than others (juveniles and adults). When examining the vulnerability of species and life stages to warming, it is particularly important to use appropriate and comparable methodology so that robust conclusions can be obtained. Critical thermal methodology (CTM) is commonly used to characterise acute thermal tolerance in fishes, with critical thermal maximum (CTmax) referring to a measured endpoint defining the upper acute thermal tolerance limit. This is the temperature at which fish exhibit loss of locomotory movements (i.e., loss of equilibrium) due to a temperature-induced collapse of vital physiological functions. While it is relatively easy to monitor behavioural responses and measure CTmax in juvenile and adult fish, this can be much more challenging in embryos. This has led to a lack of data on this life stage, or that studies rely on other, potentially incomparable, metrics.2. Here, we present a novel method for measuring acute upper thermal tolerance limits in fish embryos, where CTmax is defined by the temperature at which embryos stop moving. Additionally, we compare this measurement to the temperature at which the embryos' heart stops beating, which has previously been proposed as a method for measuring CTmax in this life stage.3. We found that, similar to other life stages, embryos exhibited a period of increased activity, which peaked approximately 2-3ºC before CTmax. Measurements of CTmax based on last movement are more conservative than measurements based on last heartbeat, additionally they are easier to record and work well with both large and small embryos. Importantly, measurements of CTmax based on last movement in embryos are similar to measurements from larval and adult stages based on loss of locomotory control.4. Using cessation of heart beats as CTmax in embryos likely overestimates acute thermal tolerance as the heart is still beating when CTmax based on loss of response/equilibrium is reached in larvae/adults. The last movement technique described here allows for comparisons of acute thermal tolerance between species, across life stages within species, and as a response variable to treatments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".